Vigyata.AI
Is this your channel?

Planning In Claude Code Just Got a Huge Upgrade

61.9K views· 1,224 likes· 15:49· Apr 6, 2026

🛍️ Products Mentioned (6)

Full courses + unlimited support: https://www.skool.com/ai-automation-society-plus/about?el=ultraplan All my FREE resources: https://www.skool.com/ai-automation-society/about?el=ultraplan Apply for my YT podcast: https://podcast.nateherk.com/apply Work with me: https://uppitai.com/ My Tools💻 FREE MONTH voice to text: https://get.glaido.com/nate Code NATEHERK for 10% off VPS (annual plan): https://www.hostinger.com/vps/claude-code-hosting Claude Code just dropped a hidden feature called Ultraplan. Instead of planning locally in your terminal, it sends your planning session to the cloud where multiple agents running Opus 4.6 work in parallel to build a much deeper, more structured plan. In this video, I break down how it works, run a side-by-side test building the same dashboard with local plan vs Ultraplan, and show you the speed and quality differences. I also dig into the technical details, including the multi-agent architecture, token usage, and what you need to know before trying it. Sponsorship Inquiries: 📧 nate@smoothmedia.co TIMESTAMPS 0:00 Ultra Plan vs Local Plan 1:43 How Ultra Plan Works 2:32 Triggering Ultra Plan 4:02 Side-by-Side Dashboard Build 6:43 Comparing the Two Dashboards 8:25 Token Usage Breakdown 10:29 Requirements 12:46 What's Happening Under the Hood 14:52 Limitations & Final Thoughts

About This Video

Claude Code just quietly dropped a feature called Ultraplan, and it’s a legit upgrade to how I plan builds. Instead of doing a slow, linear plan inside the terminal, Ultraplan ships that planning session to the cloud where multiple agents running Opus 4.6 work in parallel. The result is a way more structured plan (context, what exists, new files, modifications, verification), sometimes even with diagrams, and a much better review surface because I can comment on specific sections and then “teleport” the approved plan back into my CLI. In the video, I run a side-by-side test building the same dashboard with local plan vs Ultraplan. The Ultraplan version finished planning in about a minute in one test (while local was still running past 4 minutes), and in the bigger dashboard build it went end-to-end in roughly 10–15 minutes, while the local run dragged out massively. I also break down token/usage realities (cloud planning tokens aren’t shown), the hard requirements (it has to be launched from the CLI and your project needs Git sync), and what’s happening under the hood: three parallel exploration agents plus a critique agent in Anthropic’s cloud container runtime, capped at 30 minutes.

Frequently Asked Questions

🎬 More from Nate Herk | AI Automation