Is this your channel?
A failure to replicate an experiment from Boroditsky et al. 2003. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 2(1), 39-50.
This is another example of researchers trying to reproduce a well-known effect and not finding the same thing. It’s not as clickable as the original claim, but it’s closer to how science actually progresses: slow, argumentative, and occasionally involving spreadsheets full of adjectives.
Buy on Doi
You'll be taken to Doi to complete your purchase.
Pros
- +Shows the value of checking influential claims
- +Adds balance to a literature with publication bias toward positive results
Cons
- -Niche and method-heavy
