In this video, I break down the four AI coding tools developers keep arguing about right now: Anti-Gravity, Claude Code, Cursor, and Bolt. I keep it simple and honest—what each tool actually is, how it works day-to-day, what it costs, who it’s made for, and where it falls short. Cursor is the most familiar because it’s basically VS Code with AI baked in (tab completions, chat, agent mode, checkpoints). Claude Code is the opposite vibe: it lives in your terminal and is built for deep, serious work across a big codebase. Bolt is the browser-first option that’s all about speed—type what you want, watch it generate a working app, and deploy fast. Anti-Gravity is Google’s newest move (launched alongside Gemini 3) and it’s the most autonomous: agents that plan, write, test, and even click around your UI, plus artifacts like screenshots and task lists so you can review what happened. My main takeaway: these tools aren’t truly “one winner.” Cursor is the safest daily driver for most devs, Claude Code wins for large/complex projects and token efficiency, Bolt is best for quick prototypes, and Anti-Gravity is worth trying right now because it’s free in public preview—but it’s new, rough in places, and Google product risk is real.