On today's podcast, Executive Editor Natalie Orpett speaks with Senior Editor Scott R. Anderson about what Congress can do to direct the president to end the war in Iran. Scott's recent article in Lawfare, “What Congressional Resolutions Mean for the War in Iran,” explained why a likely presidential veto of a War Powers Resolution is not the end of the story. The War Powers Resolution gives Congress other tools—including some procedural tricks—that could have a meaningful influence on ending the war. They talk about Scott's article, why he thinks a concurrent resolution is the best option, and how congressional action may be more than just political messaging—it could have real legal significance. To receive ad-free podcasts, become a Lawfare Material Supporter at www.patreon.com/lawfare. You can also support Lawfare by making a one-time donation at https://givebutter.com/lawfare-institute.

Rational Security: The “Happy FrAIday” Edition
209 views

Lawfare Daily: Excavating Arctic Frost
830 views

Lawfare Daily: Attorney General Blanche’s Purported Waiver of Pres. Trump’s Past Tax Liabilities
1.4K views

Scaling Laws: "The God Test" AI as Cosmic Reckoning, with Robert Wright
198 views

Lawfare Live: The Trials of the Trump Administration, June 22
2.5K views

Lawfare Daily: Military Education and American Manhood with Jasper Craven
260 views