Is Google Antigravity Better Than Cursor 2.0?

🚀 Join my community to build and launch real apps with AI @ https://www.skool.com/aiapps/about 🛠️ Work with me to make $5-50k+ with your app @ https://calendly.com/chris-ashby/appstudio 💡 Get 250+ validated app ideas and the prompts to build FREE @ https://readytobuild.app/ Google just dropped Gemini 3 Pro and with it a new AI IDE that could kill Cursor. In this video I put Antigravity to the test with 3 different prompts to build apps, and compare it to Cursor so you can see Antigravity in action and whether you need to switch from Cursor or not. I break down Antigravity in detail so you can get a view of every feature compared to Cursor 2.0, and break down Google's vision for the future of AI coding tools. Chapters: 00:00 — Intro: Gemini 3 Pro and Antigravity overview. 00:35 — First look at Antigravity UI; VS Code/Cursor similarities. 01:16 — Agent Manager vision: managing multiple coding agents/workspaces. 02:47 — Plan: build three apps from single prompts. 03:04 — Picking prompts from ReadyToBuild.app. 05:14 — Prompting the quiz web app; plan mode in Antigravity. 6:21 — Prompting the micro‑thrift lister app. 9:04 — Prompting the AI writing app; plans begin generating. 13:28 — Browser testing via Chrome icon; inbox UX quirks. 14:03 — Agents terminate due to errors; retry flow. 18:05 — First design output review; UX/design feedback. 19:16 — Design improvement prompt with reference image. 20:03 — Repeated agent terminations; usage limits frustration. 21:11 — Improved writing app UI; still basic/front‑end only. 22:33 — Hitting Gemini 3 usage quotas; switch to AI Studio. 23:11 — Why AI Studio is painful for real app workflows. 25:23 — Build quiz app in Cursor with Gemini 3 Pro; plan mode Q&A. 27:33 — AI Studio thrift app output review. 28:05 — Cursor executes nine‑step plan; Antigravity as POC vs Cursor maturity. 30:01 — Cursor completes plan; local run and error handling. 31:34 — Debugging loop; GPT‑5.1 Codex fixes in one shot. 32:19 — App output quality still basic; prompt/design expectations. 33:23 — Final verdict: Antigravity immature; recommend Cursor for now. Key points: - I break down Antigravity and the agent manager user interface for coding agents - I test 3 prompts with Gemini 3 Pro High to build apps from scratch - I test Gemini 3 Pro in Google AI Studio to see the output - I create an app from scratch in Cursor using Gemini 3 Pro - I finish building my app and get it running by bug fixing with GPT 5.1 Codex High after Gemini 3 Pro fails to fix the issue Follow me on social: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashbychris/ https://x.com/chris_telescope