Sigma 16-300mm lens: http://SDP.io/S16300 (for Sony E, Canon RF, Fuji X, L-Mount) Tamron 18-300mm lens: http://SDP.io/S18300 (for Sony E, Fuji X-mount) This video compares the Sigma 16-300 and Tamron superzoom lenses for Sony APS-C cameras. Here's a summary: General: Superzoom lenses are useful for their range, even if they lack top-tier sharpness and speed. Sony has limited competitors in this category. Pricing: Sigma is $699, Tamron is $599. Handling: Both lenses have similar weight (around 615-620g). Range: Sigma offers a wider range (16mm/24mm equivalent) compared to Tamron (18mm/27mm equivalent), but phone cameras can often cover the wide end. Sharpness: Sigma is generally sharper, especially at longer telephoto lengths (200mm, 300mm). Tamron is sharper at 100mm. Macro: Macro capabilities are a tie. Contrast & Bokeh: Tamron has better contrast and slightly better bokeh. Sigma has more flaring. Conclusion: The Sigma is worth the extra $100 due to its overall better sharpness, especially at the telephoto end. 0:00 Introduction 0:46 Pricing 2:10 Sharpness vs iPhone 2:34 Zoom Range 3:28 Sharpness 4:54 Contrast 5:47 Bokeh 6:12 Summary

Is Apple Buying GoPro? Good News, Bad News!
18.6K views

The Camera Industry Shakeup No One Is Talking About
38.3K views

Sony's Newest Camera is Broken: A 701-Page Problem
40.9K views

The Problem with Teleconverters
22.8K views

Sony's NEW 100-400mm lens! Could this replace my 200-600mm?
22.7K views

The TRUTH about the Sony a7R VI! Better than Hasselblad?
60.4K views