In the COVID-19 crisis, the federal and state governments have invoked rarely used powers to quarantine, isolate, and generally restrict the movement of people into the U.S. and between and within the states. Whether confining sick and suspected sick individuals to a place or restricting travel, quarantine laws curtail individual rights in the interests of public health. When quarantine measures go too far that they potentially become arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable, it raises serious constitutional questions. Judge Andrew Napolitano explores some of those constitutional concerns as part of TalksOnLaw’s COVID-19 series. ► Visit http://www.talksonlaw.com for more legal explainers and interviews with the titans of law. ► Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/talksonlaw ► Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/talksonlaw ► Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/talksonlaw ____________________

Does Affirmative Action Backfire? The Mismatch Debate
43 views

Why a Top Law Firm Bought Its Own AI Company
36 views

Meta's Top Lawyer: AI Is Coming for Law Firms
97 views

Why Lawyers Hate Practicing Law — the Founder of Ironclad on AI
23 views

Will AI Replace Lawyers? A Yale Law Professor's Answer
124 views

Is a Lawsuit a Financial Asset? Inside Litigation Finance
42 views