Under U.S. law there is a concept of "Common Carriage" which can limit companies like railroads, phone companies, and internet service providers from discriminating among those who wish to make use of their services, but what about social media? Given the power and importance of companies like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube, can they be considered Common Carriers under American law? We ask technology law professor, Eric Goldman to explain. According to Professor Goldman, while the legal concept of a Common Carrier is a venerable legal tradition, it has not been effectively applied to companies that operate on the internet. Moreover, social media companies can rely on the powerful protections of the First Amendment's free speech and free press rights to permit it to discriminate amongst users or to remove content and accounts at their discretion. That said, some states are now attempting to force the connection by the passage of "social media censurship" laws. Goldman weighs in on these "must carry" laws and their constitutional significance. Prof. Eric Goldman is a Professor of Law at Santa Clara University School of Law in the Silicon Valley. He also serves as the associate dean of research and co-directs the High Tech Law Institute. ____________________ 0:00 What are "Common Carriers" under the law? 1:00 Are social media services common carriers? 1:30 Why Social Media Companies Are Not Common Carriers 2:07 Can States Mandate Social Media as Common Carriers? 4:30 New "Must Carry" Laws for Social Media Companies

Does Affirmative Action Backfire? The Mismatch Debate
43 views

Why a Top Law Firm Bought Its Own AI Company
36 views

Meta's Top Lawyer: AI Is Coming for Law Firms
97 views

Why Lawyers Hate Practicing Law — the Founder of Ironclad on AI
23 views

Will AI Replace Lawyers? A Yale Law Professor's Answer
124 views

Is a Lawsuit a Financial Asset? Inside Litigation Finance
42 views