Get a special 35% discount* on an annual digital subscription to The Economist at https://www.economist.com/Sabine *20% in the UK, Latin America, and India. A group of physicists claim they have proof that true randomness exists. This has implications for encryption protocols and computing, but (if true) would also indicate that the past does not determine the present. But are their findings actually legitimate? Let’s find out. Paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09054-3 🤓 Check out my new quiz app ➜ http://quizwithit.com/ 📚 Buy my book ➜ https://amzn.to/3HSAWJW 💌 Support me on Donorbox ➜ https://donorbox.org/swtg 📝 Transcripts and written news on Substack ➜ https://sciencewtg.substack.com/ 👉 Transcript with links to references on Patreon ➜ https://www.patreon.com/Sabine 📩 Free weekly science newsletter ➜ https://sabinehossenfelder.com/newsletter/ 👂 Audio only podcast ➜ https://open.spotify.com/show/0MkNfXlKnMPEUMEeKQYmYC 🔗 Join this channel to get access to perks ➜ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1yNl2E66ZzKApQdRuTQ4tw/join #science #sciencenews #physics #quantumphysics

The AI Future No One Wants to Talk About
301.3K views

Nobel Prize under fire: is dark energy real?
130.3K views

Nuclear Fusion is in Trouble
347.1K views

The End of Human Mathematics? AI's Recent Breakthrough -- And What's Next
347.5K views

Did Physics Just Lose a Brilliant Idea?
114.1K views

It's Beginning: AI Improves Itself
215.9K views