Vigyata.AI
Is this your channel?

GLM-5 is the Free Opus 4.6

13.8K views· 306 likes· 9:01· Feb 13, 2026

🛍️ Products Mentioned (4)

Is 2026 the year open source AI finally wins? In this video, I put GLM-5 to the test - a 744 billion parameter open source model that scores 50 on the Intelligent Index and rivals Claude Opus 4.6 at a fraction of the cost. I'll walk you through the GLM-5 benchmarks, show you how to run this free AI coding model and share my honest GLM-5 vs Claude Opus comparison after building a real feature with it. If you're a developer tired of paying $200/month for proprietary AI, this cheap AI alternative might be exactly what you need. Whether you're into agentic coding or just want the best open source LLM for your workflow, this GLM-5 tutorial breaks down why open source models aren't just catching up they're winning. #ai #claude #programming #agent #coding 🚀 Master Next.js 16 by shipping 7+ production-ready apps here: https://dub.sh/nextjscourse ⏰ Timeline 00:00 - Introducing GLM-5 1:11 - What makes GLM-5 different? 2:40 - GLM Benchmarks vs Opus 4.5 4:52 - How to run GLM-5 Locally? 6:57 - Hardware Requirements for running GLM-5 8:04 - The Future of Open Source AI 🔗 RESOURCES: 💌 Frontend Newsletter: Frontend Snacks 🍿 https://bit.ly/fesnacks If you liked this video, you will also love my newsletter Frontend Snacks. You will learn a new topic each week with cool visuals and snippets, the latest frontend news and behind-the-scenes exclusive updates that I don't share anywhere else. ✨ FREE Goodies: https://kulkarniankita.com/goodies ☎️ Work with me 1:1 Got a question about AI, Next.js or your career? Let's figure it out together: https://dub.sh/one-on-one-with-ankita 🐤 Find me here Twitter: https://twitter.com/kulkarniankita9/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kulkarniankita/

About This Video

I genuinely think 2026 is the year open source models finally win, and GLM-5 is the best proof I’ve seen so far. In this video, I break down what just dropped: a 744B parameter open-weights “monster” that hits ~50 on the Intelligent Index (the first open coding model to do it) and matches Claude Opus 4.5 on a bunch of real tasks—at a fraction of the cost. The stat I care about even more than size is hallucination behavior: according to the reports I reference, GLM-5 reduces hallucinations massively and actually abstains when it doesn’t know. As a developer, I’ve been begging for that. I walk through benchmarks (including agentic/long-horizon tests like VendingBench and web-browsing task completion) and then I show how I tested it in a real workflow: I used it inside a coding agent to build a comments feature on my course platform. It basically one-shotted the schema and implementation without me spoon-feeding file context, and it didn’t fall apart the way I expected a brand-new open model to. I also get practical about running it: the full BF16 weights are ~1.5TB, so you’re not spinning this up on a MacBook. The point is you can still use it through hosted providers or tools, and when you compare token costs (think ~$0.80/M vs Opus-class ~$15/M), it’s the difference between agentic coding being affordable… or not.

Frequently Asked Questions

🎬 More from Ankita Kulkarni