Check out My Recommendations (It helps support the channel): 📝 Boldin - The retirement planning tool I use to make sure I'm on track with saving for retirement. It's perfect for "Do it yourself" investors https://bit.ly/3EAAhrJ Personal Finance Bundle Wait List: https://bit.ly/4bpyTHT 💬 Sign up for 1 on 1 coaching with me: https://bit.ly/4bAUpYT 📖 Free copy of my Spending Review Spreadsheet: https://bit.ly/48lMVZ1 📧 Business Inquiries: https://bit.ly/44AgfLw The fear of investing for a decade and ending up with less purchasing power than when you started what’s known as a “lost decade” is a very real concern. A lost decade is defined as any 10 year stretch where inflation-adjusted returns dip below 0%. While rare, they’ve happened in U.S. market history and can feel like a massive setback, especially for those relying on steady growth to reach financial goals. An analysis of 96 years of U.S. stock market data using different scenarios revealed that lump-sum investing with no dividends reinvested led to three lost decades: the 1930s, 1970s, and early 2000s. But this isn't how most people invest. When switching to monthly dollar-cost averaging (DCA), the number of lost decades increased to seven. However, reinvesting dividends significantly improved the outcome cutting lost decades down to just two. Global diversification was tested by adding international stocks to the portfolio. Surprisingly, a 70/30 U.S./international split slightly increased the number of lost decades to three, due to the global nature of the economic challenges in the late 1960s and 1970s. Adjusting the allocation to a 60/40 mix reduced the number back to two, with a 50/50 split providing no further improvement. This suggests that while global diversification doesn’t guarantee a smoother ride, it can reduce risk when thoughtfully balanced. For investors in the accumulation phase, avoiding lost decades isn’t just about asset allocation it’s about consistent behavior. Continuing to invest during boring or down markets, automating contributions, keeping fees low, and diversifying globally all help minimize long-term risk. It’s also important to remember that investing success depends more on discipline and patience than perfect timing. Ultimately, lost decades are only clear in hindsight, and while they can’t always be avoided, they don’t have to derail your financial future. By sticking to a smart, automated, and low-cost plan, you can stay on track and be ready to benefit from the eventual recovery when the markets bounce back as they always have. Affiliate Disclaimer: Some of the links above are affiliate links. If you sign up or make a purchase through them, I may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Your support means a lot and helps keep the channel going. Thank you! General Disclaimer: This content is for entertainment and informational purposes only. Everyone’s financial situation is different, so be sure to do your own research and consider speaking with a professional before making any financial decisions. Can You Really Lose Money After a 10 Years of Investing? What History Says About Beating a Lost Decade of Investing I Analyzed 96 Years of Investing Data - Here’s What I Found The Investing Nightmare No One Wants to Talk About 272

Why a 100% U.S. Stock Portfolio Feels Safer Than It Is
10.2K views

Why You’re Not as Close to Financial Independence as You Think
5.7K views

The 4% Rule Can Fail Earlier Than You Think
6.0K views

Why Net Worth Goals Don’t Work
5.6K views

Do This Before 50 or Retirement Gets Harder
10.7K views

Why Target Date Funds Deserve a Warning Label
9.5K views